ESPR explained: the regulation behind the Digital Product Passport

ESPR is a framework. It creates almost no direct product obligations by itself — everything real arrives through delegated acts. Understanding that structure explains why nobody can tell you your requirements yet.

The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation — Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 — entered into force on 18 July 2024. It replaces the 2009 Ecodesign Directive and dramatically widens its scope: where the Directive covered energy-related products, ESPR covers essentially any physical good placed on the EU market, including components and intermediate products.

Why "framework" is the important word

ESPR sets out machinery, not requirements. It defines what a Digital Product Passport is, what parameters can be regulated, who bears which obligations, and how enforcement works. It does not, by itself, tell any manufacturer what their product must achieve.

That comes from delegated acts — secondary legislation the Commission adopts per product group, setting the actual performance and information requirements. Until a delegated act covers your product, ESPR imposes almost nothing on it directly.

This is why the honest answer to "what does my DPP need to contain" is currently "nobody knows for your product", and why that answer is not evasive.

Two exceptions worth knowing. ESPR does contain directly applicable obligations. The unsold-goods regime in Chapter VI applies without any delegated act — and its destruction ban took effect on 19 July 2026. The economic operator duties in Chapter VII also apply directly, though they only bite for products a delegated act covers.

The messy repeal

ESPR repealed the Ecodesign Directive from the day it entered into force, but with long carve-outs that matter if you sell appliances.

  • Nineteen named product groups continue under the old Directive until 31 December 2026 — including photovoltaic panels, vacuum cleaners, cooking appliances, computers, servers and data storage, imaging equipment, water and space heaters, air conditioners and ventilation units.
  • Products under existing implementing measures can continue until 31 December 2030 where amendments are needed for technical reasons.
  • A ten-year document retention duty survives for products placed under the old Directive.

The working plan, and what it dropped

The first ESPR working plan was adopted on 16 April 2025, covering 2025–2030 with a mid-term review in 2028. It names the priority product groups and their indicative delegated act years.

CategoryGroupIndicative act
Final productsTextiles and apparel2027
Tyres2027
Furniture2028
Mattresses2029
Intermediate productsIron and steel2026
Aluminium2027
HorizontalRepairability, including scoring2027
Recycled content and recyclability of EEE2029

What was dropped, and why it matters

ESPR Article 18 had listed a longer candidate set. The working plan exercised the Commission's discretion and removed several:

  • Detergents, paints and lubricants — dropped. Assessed as having lower impacts and lower improvement potential, with weaker consultation support.
  • Footwear — separated from textiles and deferred pending a study due by the end of 2027.
  • Chemicals — highly ranked but judged too complex; a scoping study was to be launched for a future working plan.
  • ICT and electronics — not made a standalone group, handled instead through horizontal requirements and the energy-related products transition.

The lesson generalises: you cannot infer your obligations from the ESPR framework text. Being named as a candidate in Article 18 means very little. The working plan is where the real prioritisation happens, and it revises. If you read in 2024 that detergents were in scope, that was true of the framework and is not true of the plan.

"Indicative" means indicative

Every date in that table is indicative. None binds the Commission, and delegated acts routinely slip. As of 21 July 2026, no ESPR product-specific delegated act has been adopted, and preparatory work is confirmed under way for only two groups: textiles and steel.

Iron and steel carried an indicative 2026 date. With under six months of the year left and no draft published, that date looks unlikely to hold — which is a useful calibration for every other date on the plan.

Enforcement and penalties

Article 74 requires member states to set penalties that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, and to ensure authorities can at minimum impose fines and time-limited exclusion from public procurement. Aggravating factors include the nature and duration of the breach, intent or negligence, financial benefit derived, and environmental damage caused.

There is no EU-wide ESPR fine schedule. Specific euro figures circulating in commentary — a maximum per claim in one member state, a percentage of turnover in another — generally come from other national product or consumer regimes, not from ESPR transposition. Treat any confidently stated "the ESPR fine is X" as unverified.

The working plan itself acknowledges that online sales enforcement is weak, describing non-compliance in e-commerce as "particularly pervasive and challenging to address", especially on non-EU platforms, and estimating around 10% of expected benefits lost to it. Expect enforcement effort to be aimed squarely at that gap.

Questions

Does ESPR apply to my products right now?
The regulation applies, but its product requirements arrive via delegated acts and none has been adopted. Two parts do apply directly today: the unsold-goods regime, whose destruction ban took effect on 19 July 2026 for apparel, clothing accessories and footwear, and the economic operator duties in Chapter VII.
How long between a delegated act and having to comply?
Typically around eighteen months, though the act itself sets the period and there is no fixed rule. Practically, treat the indicative act year plus eighteen months as a planning assumption, and remember the act year is itself indicative.
Detergents were listed in the regulation. Are they in scope?
No. Detergents, paints and lubricants were candidates in the framework text but were dropped from the first working plan on impact and improvement-potential grounds. They could return in a future working plan, but there is currently no scheduled act. This is the clearest example of why the framework text is not a reliable guide to obligations.
What is the difference between ESPR and the Batteries Regulation?
Separate instruments. The Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 predates ESPR and creates the battery passport independently, with a firm date of 18 February 2027. ESPR creates the general DPP framework for everything else. A battery sold in the EU engages both: the passport comes from the Batteries Regulation, while ESPR dealer duties still govern how you present it in your store.

Sources

Turn this into a plan for your catalogue

The readiness checklist walks your product groups one at a time and tells you what data to start collecting from suppliers now.

Open the readiness checklist